IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tristan Caldwell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-01-26 Country: Canada
Norwich
LittleEast D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Nepean Raiders CCHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Nepean Raiders CCHL 46 2 5 7 0.152 0.0330 0.0350 0.1166 0.1238
2023-24 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 43 1 4 5 0.116 0.0474 0.0487 0.0931 0.0957
2024-25 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 52 3 22 25 0.481 0.1960 0.1822 0.3847 0.3576
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
48%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9480
Defenseman overall
#2067
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Norwich Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Taeron Lewis
0.27
actual FR PPG at Norwich
Scott Swanson
0.48
actual FR PPG at Norwich
Trevor Stewart
0.46
actual FR PPG at Norwich
Phil Sbrocchi
0.43
actual FR PPG at Norwich

D2/3 Comparables

Robert Pizzey
Alvernia · 2022-23
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Boyce
Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Lyon
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.