IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ty Creech

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
Amherst
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Salisbury School NE-Prep 26 2 6 8 0.308 0.0610 0.0610 0.1402 0.1402
2022-23 Salisbury School NE-Prep 28 1 2 3 0.107 0.0212 0.0212 0.0488 0.0488
2023-24 Salisbury School NE-Prep 26 7 11 18 0.692 0.1371 0.1371 0.3154 0.3154
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14222
Defenseman overall
#784
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Amherst Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Nicholas Bondra
0.71
actual FR PPG at Amherst
Michael Rowbotham
0.64
actual FR PPG at Amherst
Pieter von Steinbergs
0.62
actual FR PPG at Amherst
Rylan Burns
0.62
actual FR PPG at Amherst

D2/3 Comparables

Zac Boyle
Neumann · 2014-15
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Kromm
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2009-10
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Crowley
SUNY Brockport · 2002-03
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.