IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alexis Fortin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-10-04 Country: Canada
Vermont
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Val-d'Or Foreurs QMJHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Val-d'Or Foreurs QMJHL 53 3 4 7 0.132 0.0649 0.0698 0.3527 0.3792
2025-26 Val-d'Or Foreurs QMJHL 63 4 5 9 0.143 0.0702 0.0722 0.3816 0.3922
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22634
Defenseman overall
#2687
Defenseman born in 2007
#1780
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Vermont Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Mario Gasparini
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.09
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Jack Malinski
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.23
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Eli Barnett
BCHL 2021-22
0.21
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Caeden Herrington
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.24
actual FR PPG at Vermont

D2/3 Comparables

Bryant Wilson
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2001-02
0.448 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Braden Crone
Concordia · 2011-12
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Zac Sikich
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.