IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sam Osei Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-02-02 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Army
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 43 1 7 8 0.186 0.0683 0.0704 0.1963 0.2025
2025-26 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 57 3 15 18 0.316 0.1160 0.1139 0.3333 0.3273
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16242
Defenseman overall
#2845
Defenseman born in 2006
#5129
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

Army Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Brad Zona
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Army
Owen Nolan
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.12
actual FR PPG at Army
Brody Medeiros
NAHL 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Army
Matthew Berkovitz
USHL 2015-16
0.00
actual FR PPG at Army

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Robertson
Suffolk · 2007-08
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Regen Cavanagh
Utica · 2016-17
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Mitchell
Chatham · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.