IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caden Hegarty Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-07 Country: USA
Amherst
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Rosemount USHS-MN 21 3 4 7 0.333 0.0422 0.0422 0.0809 0.0809
2021-22 Rosemount USHS-MN 27 7 14 21 0.778 0.0985 0.0985 0.1888 0.1888
2022-23 Rosemount USHS-MN 27 10 34 44 1.630 0.2063 0.2063 0.3957 0.3957
2023-24 Neepawa Titans MJHL 47 8 11 19 0.404 0.0778 0.0797 0.2555 0.2617
2024-25 Neepawa Titans MJHL 56 25 20 45 0.804 0.1547 0.1499 0.5078 0.4922
2025-26 — NAHL 51 20 27 47 0.922 0.3386 0.3186 0.9740 0.9165
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20244
Forward overall
#1079
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

Amherst Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Nicholas Bondra
0.71
actual FR PPG at Amherst
Keenan Hodgson
1.11
actual FR PPG at Amherst
Conor Brown
0.86
actual FR PPG at Amherst
Michael Rowbotham
0.64
actual FR PPG at Amherst

D2/3 Comparables

Drew Iannucci
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Travis Broughman
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lukas Ciotti
Adrian · 2010-11
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.