IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Calabria Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-12-16 Country: USA
Hobart
SUNYAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Frederick Gunn NE-Prep 34 5 2 7 0.206 0.0408 0.0408 0.0938 0.0938
2022-23 Frederick Gunn NE-Prep 36 6 18 24 0.667 0.1321 0.1321 0.3037 0.3037
2023-24 Frederick Gunn NE-Prep 35 5 17 22 0.629 0.1245 0.1245 0.2864 0.2864
2024-25 Okotoks Oilers BCHL 53 2 9 11 0.207 0.0799 0.0805 0.3020 0.3043
2025-26 Okotoks Oilers BCHL 37 4 9 13 0.351 0.1354 0.1314 0.5114 0.4964
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13545
Defenseman overall
#2678
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

Hobart Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Cam Shaheen
0.58
actual FR PPG at Hobart
Mike Faulkner
0.75
actual FR PPG at Hobart
Ben Gamache
0.56
actual FR PPG at Hobart
Easton Ryan
0.45
actual FR PPG at Hobart

D2/3 Comparables

Spencer DeRidder
Salem State · 2018-19
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Troy Andrews
New England College · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Hayden Dawes
Utica · 2013-14
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.