IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Guerin Slezak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-07-11 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Princeton
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 50 0 2 2 0.040 0.0236 0.0250 0.1201 0.1273
2024-25 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 61 3 8 11 0.180 0.1064 0.1074 0.5415 0.5464
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21307
Defenseman overall
#3442
Defenseman born in 2006
#4027
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Princeton Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Noah de la Durantaye
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.36
actual FR PPG at Princeton
Tyler Rubin
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.19
actual FR PPG at Princeton
Reid Yochim
BCHL 2016-17
0.45
actual FR PPG at Princeton
Nick Marciano
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.08
actual FR PPG at Princeton

D2/3 Comparables

Nikita Kozyrev
Buffalo State · 2016-17
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Doust
Fredonia · 2008-09
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Tretowicz
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2016-17
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.