IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Wyatt Herres Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-01-27 Country: USA
UMass Lowell
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Notre Dame Academy (Wis.) USHS-MN 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Notre Dame Academy (Wis.) USHS-MN 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Wisconsin Windigo NAHL 49 2 9 11 0.225 0.0825 0.0891 0.2370 0.2561
2025-26 Chicago Steel USHL 44 4 12 16 0.364 0.2145 0.2120 1.0920 1.0790
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

78%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9078
Defenseman overall
#1255
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Nolan Gluchowski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Vince Pedrie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Woods
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Wingels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eric Sweetman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

UMass Lowell Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Ben Meehan
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.47
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
Christian Folin
SHL 2025-26
0.55
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
Larry Keenan
BCHL 2023-24
0.28
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
T.J. Schweighardt
NCDC 2019-20
0.11
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell

D2/3 Comparables

Sam Ciappa
St. John Fisher · 2024-25
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Armour
Adrian · 2012-13
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tom Bark
Lake Forest · 2008-09
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.